静かな日々の階段を

主にCSO、CS1.6でのMdNの活動について書いていこうと思います。




スポンサーサイト :: --/--/--(--)
上記の広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。
新しい記事を書く事で広告が消せます。


  1. スポンサー広告




今日の名言 :: 2008/05/19(Mon)
彼氏居ても普通に他の男いく

うん、そのとおりだと思います^-^

まぁそれは置いといて熱でて一週間ほど経つんだけど治らない・・・

というか頭痛がひどいって感じです('A`)

俺は昔から鼻が弱くて年中鼻水ズルズルなんですよね

耳鼻科常連組ってくらい通ってます。

頭痛いというよりは鼻周辺が殴られて青あざできたときみたいに痛いです;

てことで今から病院いってきます('A`)

夜はギターの練習あるしinできるのは23時くらいかな(。´Д⊂)

最近知り合った絢花さんと毎日ビシャス約束しちゃったんでなるべく早く帰ります(´・ω・`)

Maple3028.jpg


これって今いくらくらいなんでしょう。
スポンサーサイト


  1. キクジロウ
  2. | trackback:0
  3. | comment:254



<<GANTZが売ってない | top | (^Д^)9m >>


comment

あれじゃね?
頭蓋骨に鼻水固まってカッチカチになる病気
手術は顔の皮はがして削るらしいよ
そうじゃないことを祈るよ、ふふふ・・・。
  1. 2008/05/19(Mon) 19:27:47 |
  2. URL |
  3. ワンコ #-
  4. [ 編集 ]

あはん
  1. 2008/05/19(Mon) 23:26:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. くくか様 #-
  4. [ 編集 ]

大丈夫?

ちゃんと治すんだよ~

こないだへネでみかけたわ
  1. 2008/05/20(Tue) 16:55:37 |
  2. URL |
  3. sarato #41Gd1xPo
  4. [ 編集 ]

彼氏居ても普通に他の男いく

せんせー、この意味が通じない僕は人間失格ですか?

愛送っておくから早く治るよー>w<b
  1. 2008/05/20(Tue) 23:11:49 |
  2. URL |
  3. むーたん #/EYJAHD6
  4. [ 編集 ]

ワンコ>そんなことはなかったからよかったw

クク>あぁん

さらとc>心配してくれてありがと;-;俺も見かけた気します!

むたん>受け取りました>w<
  1. 2008/05/22(Thu) 03:43:23 |
  2. URL |
  3. キクジロウ #VhNaT.1s
  4. [ 編集 ]

承認待ちコメント

このコメントは管理者の承認待ちです
  1. 2011/05/14(Sat) 12:33:06 |
  2. |
  3. #
  4. [ 編集 ]

uAbStffxEb

,
  1. 2011/10/23(Sun) 08:16:32 |
  2. URL |
  3. CaitlinCharles #-
  4. [ 編集 ]

KRRjSokxRvpLOEZDMB

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/04/03(Tue) 16:41:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Autumn_Missouri #t3JT1e..
  4. [ 編集 ]

VCcyQzPqAbShhDYTtwD

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/04/03(Tue) 19:18:01 |
  2. URL |
  3. Gianna_New_Mexico #dFwxJD3I
  4. [ 編集 ]

JAxLbILdycUU

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
  1. 2012/04/03(Tue) 20:54:50 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mackenzie_South_Carolina #zQITR7kI
  4. [ 編集 ]

qVSNiMxLYIVKf

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/04/03(Tue) 21:28:21 |
  2. URL |
  3. Addison_Arizona #NTbp4aBg
  4. [ 編集 ]

ibjOsAnrQkhFNsnf

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/04/03(Tue) 22:36:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexa_North_Dakota #YDGixzX6
  4. [ 編集 ]

UPVprJqGLTRSNbTpK

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  1. 2012/04/03(Tue) 23:10:12 |
  2. URL |
  3. Gabrielle_Oregon #Jefa96Go
  4. [ 編集 ]

kRHgeYfMrf

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/04/03(Tue) 23:40:59 |
  2. URL |
  3. Bella_Texas #..OWea0Y
  4. [ 編集 ]

fAAbvFxfdczDy

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 00:45:37 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kimberly_Utah #ejd49dGI
  4. [ 編集 ]

JNHaWAoVNeQtU

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 01:16:59 |
  2. URL |
  3. Eva_Nevada #C3DwZqpE
  4. [ 編集 ]

LVykwYLvtkhemMZFE

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 01:48:03 |
  2. URL |
  3. Zoe_Arkansas #eSSQMssM
  4. [ 編集 ]

BaXsIBxgEZsmuxkq

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 02:49:20 |
  2. URL |
  3. Gianna_Texas #RiUpOkaI
  4. [ 編集 ]

LOhmOgrSvAqxtP

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 03:21:35 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lillian_Oklahoma #JyLyk09g
  4. [ 編集 ]

iLDbuaEFumpmHDGtI

I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 04:25:04 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaitlyn_Vermont #d.2gDF7U
  4. [ 編集 ]

rvYbLHNTvwFrBfNAq

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 04:56:28 |
  2. URL |
  3. Leah_Idaho #LLyskSlA
  4. [ 編集 ]

WufSqVMfufUISk

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 05:24:09 |
  2. URL |
  3. Grace_South_Dakota #e7Xc1VxI
  4. [ 編集 ]

urVkijPpltMN

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 05:51:20 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sydney_Connecticut #bBRZgbsM
  4. [ 編集 ]

lOfSNKhQTrzp

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 07:35:29 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jocelyn_New_Jersey #JK2DbPbw
  4. [ 編集 ]

AKIahwYHyBcxZtvpS

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 08:01:20 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maya_Illinois #wN6vBy6w
  4. [ 編集 ]

evOadOJjIFX

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 08:27:35 |
  2. URL |
  3. Molly_Colorado #k5/VuNjo
  4. [ 編集 ]

OVuBAtErsCHaY

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 08:53:29 |
  2. URL |
  3. Genesis_Virginia #QdA6TXcA
  4. [ 編集 ]

AKmatINcMPWsNoz

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 09:19:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madeline_Montana #quo6h04Q
  4. [ 編集 ]

FzbOOdqFetw

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 09:45:59 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ava_Louisiana #VFBo2YDM
  4. [ 編集 ]

YTCjKCQXiHeZYWcyS

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 11:05:19 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexandra_Kansas #nL4Z44zQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

vZoJXaNnUlEzsJ

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 11:31:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Serenity_North_Dakota #WB.t3oH6
  4. [ 編集 ]

MWxXZLjcsFagzNmva

I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 11:57:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emma_South_Carolina #lJX.rfWo
  4. [ 編集 ]

vqCatuDKSNqFbg

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 12:23:22 |
  2. URL |
  3. Bella_Nevada #6C0q5RKQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

vfSUjvIOzNgVhjjHsL

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 12:49:58 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaitlyn_Oregon #yv6bAi8g
  4. [ 編集 ]

OyyhzzWjYyTbqn

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 13:16:42 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mackenzie_Montana #DI.J7cgA
  4. [ 編集 ]

qnOevogsEH

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 14:09:47 |
  2. URL |
  3. Addison_South_Carolina #ycEZ90XQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

gevDwyelUCwg

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 15:17:23 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexis_Connecticut #vzXoW/EA
  4. [ 編集 ]

DQnSggUXJgzUKCnc

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 15:47:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maya_Vermont #mjoaRHWk
  4. [ 編集 ]

inNWLNQzxSzPX

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 16:17:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emily_Minnesota #yYaOUQ4.
  4. [ 編集 ]

EVoDiLlkcdY

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 16:47:45 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexis_Arkansas #pXfbMrZ6
  4. [ 編集 ]

VMmtjByTII

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 17:48:29 |
  2. URL |
  3. Abigail_Connecticut #pENgE8Lo
  4. [ 編集 ]

UNDtuhClQyrWPcYXNW

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 18:18:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ashley_Missouri #9LcbshUU
  4. [ 編集 ]

fHvoIyFeFpnK

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 18:49:45 |
  2. URL |
  3. Naomi_Nevada #nk98aHNw
  4. [ 編集 ]

tAQwqHuxdOrJdqST

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 19:22:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexis_Arizona #.02tknps
  4. [ 編集 ]

CoAgWIElkIC

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 19:57:08 |
  2. URL |
  3. Bella_Kentucky #Fa.EDiH2
  4. [ 編集 ]

FxOAYgrfPEZ

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/04/04(Wed) 21:15:40 |
  2. URL |
  3. Stella_Alaska #B9xRCKAk
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/05/30(Wed) 02:31:41 |
  2. URL |
  3. Elizabeth_Minnesota #kScPIKFU
  4. [ 編集 ]

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/05/30(Wed) 04:15:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lucy_Wyoming #i.qtnQY.
  4. [ 編集 ]

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/05/30(Wed) 04:51:22 |
  2. URL |
  3. Paige_North_Carolina #02CvCjJU
  4. [ 編集 ]

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/05/30(Wed) 05:27:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Valeria_Arizona #3VeCgkFc
  4. [ 編集 ]

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/05/30(Wed) 06:02:03 |
  2. URL |
  3. Brianna_Alaska #UPVQUWJA
  4. [ 編集 ]

I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
  1. 2012/05/30(Wed) 06:36:08 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexis_Nebraska #pwME/Qvs
  4. [ 編集 ]

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/05/30(Wed) 09:26:49 |
  2. URL |
  3. Aubrey_Oregon #O0TLi/OM
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
  1. 2012/05/30(Wed) 11:11:51 |
  2. URL |
  3. Khloe_California #BoFpDN1E
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/05/30(Wed) 11:46:21 |
  2. URL |
  3. Natalie_Kentucky #lP16f61A
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/05/30(Wed) 14:44:42 |
  2. URL |
  3. Peyton_Kansas #m2RtcBmc
  4. [ 編集 ]

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/06/03(Sun) 14:53:40 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ashley_Oklahoma #9UxW/WmU
  4. [ 編集 ]

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/06/03(Sun) 15:41:29 |
  2. URL |
  3. Camila_Oklahoma #ieYu5iG6
  4. [ 編集 ]

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/03(Sun) 16:30:23 |
  2. URL |
  3. Valeria_South_Dakota #Kh1AS7Pk
  4. [ 編集 ]

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/03(Sun) 17:19:58 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kayla_New_York #ktU3xMeU
  4. [ 編集 ]

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/06/03(Sun) 18:59:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Makayla_New_Hampshire #Ndtw09AA
  4. [ 編集 ]

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/03(Sun) 19:51:04 |
  2. URL |
  3. Katherine_Colorado #O5w6IzUA
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/03(Sun) 20:41:33 |
  2. URL |
  3. Payton_Minnesota #VtZKlubk
  4. [ 編集 ]

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/06/03(Sun) 21:32:40 |
  2. URL |
  3. Olivia_South_Dakota #W5LeFrVc
  4. [ 編集 ]

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
  1. 2012/06/03(Sun) 22:23:36 |
  2. URL |
  3. Addison_Arkansas #RrUKXC5A
  4. [ 編集 ]

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 00:07:10 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sophie_Virginia #yIoV5Q.M
  4. [ 編集 ]

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 00:58:06 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexis_Vermont #nCKWn3AE
  4. [ 編集 ]

In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 01:49:09 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madelyn_South_Carolina #nC5GoHn2
  4. [ 編集 ]

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 02:38:19 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emma_Arkansas #o4UbvxaY
  4. [ 編集 ]

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 03:28:05 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kayla_Georgia #CVMt1w2o
  4. [ 編集 ]

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 05:06:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lillian_Indiana #wBxfgi.c
  4. [ 編集 ]

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 05:55:14 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaitlyn_Minnesota #/BNeIpKk
  4. [ 編集 ]

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 06:43:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Gianna_Rhode_Island #XgzKX6I6
  4. [ 編集 ]

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 07:31:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexis_Alabama #p1jU8rQw
  4. [ 編集 ]

In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 08:21:14 |
  2. URL |
  3. Payton_Ohio #V6.YKMhA
  4. [ 編集 ]

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 09:10:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Chloe_Maryland #zrmJerFs
  4. [ 編集 ]

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 09:59:19 |
  2. URL |
  3. Layla_North_Carolina #nlYYq8Bc
  4. [ 編集 ]

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 10:48:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaylee_Louisiana #xBpu3WAU
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 11:38:27 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sophie_Iowa #270c34jw
  4. [ 編集 ]

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 12:29:23 |
  2. URL |
  3. Victoria_Alabama #TCmgi1xE
  4. [ 編集 ]

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 14:58:37 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lauren_Rhode_Island #X5gbQjQw
  4. [ 編集 ]

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/06/04(Mon) 15:49:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maria_Maryland #dRwwgn5E
  4. [ 編集 ]

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 11:49:47 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kayla_Texas #TkhFY.bs
  4. [ 編集 ]

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 12:40:17 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jocelyn_Idaho #pZZun2bY
  4. [ 編集 ]

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 13:30:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lucy_Washington #PO046EkI
  4. [ 編集 ]

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 14:22:23 |
  2. URL |
  3. Trinity_Illinois #7nlP3HVo
  4. [ 編集 ]

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 15:17:29 |
  2. URL |
  3. Addison_Arkansas #KsYeLUv2
  4. [ 編集 ]

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 16:11:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Anna_Florida #KgNW/tQQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 17:03:40 |
  2. URL |
  3. Arianna_New_Mexico #B9XEY4dg
  4. [ 編集 ]

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 17:56:21 |
  2. URL |
  3. Abigail_Pennsylvania #zzgI7lws
  4. [ 編集 ]

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 18:49:54 |
  2. URL |
  3. Audrey_Georgia #eLFwwiQc
  4. [ 編集 ]

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 19:47:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Katherine_Rhode_Island #Ie5QFsjI
  4. [ 編集 ]

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 20:44:11 |
  2. URL |
  3. Trinity_Rhode_Island #9JR0vRfg
  4. [ 編集 ]

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 21:37:23 |
  2. URL |
  3. Layla_South_Carolina #mtaZYjKs
  4. [ 編集 ]

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 22:29:28 |
  2. URL |
  3. Anna_Pennsylvania #1uYSo7DY
  4. [ 編集 ]

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/06/23(Sat) 23:22:22 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lucy_Kentucky #K97/xL6E
  4. [ 編集 ]

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 00:15:45 |
  2. URL |
  3. Trinity_Oklahoma #TIXfx57.
  4. [ 編集 ]

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 01:08:24 |
  2. URL |
  3. Olivia_New_Jersey #0hs.JeVs
  4. [ 編集 ]

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 02:01:08 |
  2. URL |
  3. Taylor_New_Hampshire #.bRT3PKI
  4. [ 編集 ]

I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 02:52:34 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maria_Oklahoma #8L9wCXdc
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 03:42:55 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jocelyn_Nevada #MLbHJz8I
  4. [ 編集 ]

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 04:33:59 |
  2. URL |
  3. Hannah_Alabama #H8uGmFfQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 05:23:56 |
  2. URL |
  3. Aaliyah_California #.Vy1hn1I
  4. [ 編集 ]

I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 06:13:06 |
  2. URL |
  3. Hannah_Oregon #fGjIb3II
  4. [ 編集 ]

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 07:02:16 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kimberly_Nevada #FDPlwXVc
  4. [ 編集 ]

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 07:51:15 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madeline_South_Carolina #DwANeaWM
  4. [ 編集 ]

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 08:40:14 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mia_Indiana #YFAlNQj2
  4. [ 編集 ]

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 09:29:01 |
  2. URL |
  3. Layla_Virginia #wUHvYcCI
  4. [ 編集 ]

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 10:18:08 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maria_Oregon #6jwq3AfM
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 11:08:41 |
  2. URL |
  3. Caroline_Massachusetts #5TzGUKms
  4. [ 編集 ]

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 12:00:01 |
  2. URL |
  3. Peyton_Iowa #uEq7nfFo
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 13:43:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaitlyn_Indiana #4LFePHlY
  4. [ 編集 ]

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 14:35:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maya_Alaska #BG.wxCng
  4. [ 編集 ]

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 15:27:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Rachel_Tennessee #zKGam7XU
  4. [ 編集 ]

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 16:20:11 |
  2. URL |
  3. Destiny_Arkansas #q5C1EV0w
  4. [ 編集 ]

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 17:13:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Molly_Tennessee #ssPpqsJo
  4. [ 編集 ]

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 18:06:00 |
  2. URL |
  3. Amelia_North_Dakota #4UYXNbuY
  4. [ 編集 ]

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 18:57:36 |
  2. URL |
  3. Addison_Vermont #1EeKC6Ds
  4. [ 編集 ]

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 19:49:45 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lily_Kentucky #Qke6UYkE
  4. [ 編集 ]

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 20:42:31 |
  2. URL |
  3. Zoey_Maryland #ikkrPNO6
  4. [ 編集 ]

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 21:37:07 |
  2. URL |
  3. Victoria_Rhode_Island #BMklDZyY
  4. [ 編集 ]

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 22:30:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Anna_Connecticut #EaZdSTfI
  4. [ 編集 ]

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 23:24:49 |
  2. URL |
  3. Avery_North_Dakota #f2KH8T3.
  4. [ 編集 ]

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
  1. 2012/06/24(Sun) 23:52:00 |
  2. URL |
  3. Destiny_Illinois #9VhY8c0o
  4. [ 編集 ]

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 00:59:45 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sophie_Mississippi #jr/oG4E2
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 02:10:06 |
  2. URL |
  3. Bella_Nebraska #p3mkskR2
  4. [ 編集 ]

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 03:24:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Brooke_Vermont #3bCCc.aE
  4. [ 編集 ]

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 06:25:37 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jessica_South_Carolina #ErxnbYiE
  4. [ 編集 ]

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 08:01:00 |
  2. URL |
  3. Zoe_Maine #3NE3uL7Q
  4. [ 編集 ]

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 09:27:41 |
  2. URL |
  3. Leah_Arizona #IPWmDvS6
  4. [ 編集 ]

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 10:44:42 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maya_Arkansas #KWwLCeRc
  4. [ 編集 ]

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 11:56:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Savannah_Washington #k34jBWsc
  4. [ 編集 ]

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 13:05:57 |
  2. URL |
  3. Layla_California #h/0EWwKg
  4. [ 編集 ]

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 14:13:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Angelina_Delaware #egeLQx3o
  4. [ 編集 ]

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 15:23:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Peyton_New_Hampshire #epyXwHTA
  4. [ 編集 ]

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 16:32:57 |
  2. URL |
  3. Melanie_Tennessee #YKsq9/xk
  4. [ 編集 ]

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 17:41:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Grace_South_Carolina #GJWy3CQ6
  4. [ 編集 ]

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 18:53:09 |
  2. URL |
  3. Stella_Connecticut #uKWA4VaQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 20:03:31 |
  2. URL |
  3. Molly_Mississippi #aL/UmX4o
  4. [ 編集 ]

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 20:34:48 |
  2. URL |
  3. Charlotte_Wisconsin #WNmsbawA
  4. [ 編集 ]

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 22:03:28 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mariah_Wyoming #9w.sCCjw
  4. [ 編集 ]

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 23:22:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Brianna_Montana #v4Ye2MwE
  4. [ 編集 ]

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/06/25(Mon) 23:30:42 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maya_New_Mexico #65roOIxg
  4. [ 編集 ]

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 00:35:26 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sophia_Alaska #TZ30epsI
  4. [ 編集 ]

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 01:52:31 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ashley_Michigan #NHUn5T6I
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 02:27:22 |
  2. URL |
  3. Hailey_New_Mexico #r0xsxeRU
  4. [ 編集 ]

I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 03:07:07 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mariah_Iowa #1A85L0Xs
  4. [ 編集 ]

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 03:58:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Morgan_Iowa #gL6WgUVI
  4. [ 編集 ]

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 05:27:54 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaylee_Alabama #5CKmJEPY
  4. [ 編集 ]

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 05:38:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Natalia_Rhode_Island #h4uh51QA
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 06:56:31 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madeline_Tennessee #D04rRVv.
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 06:57:04 |
  2. URL |
  3. Avery_Wyoming #UCBsSs5g
  4. [ 編集 ]

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 08:26:20 |
  2. URL |
  3. Gabriella_Maryland #1WAzKJds
  4. [ 編集 ]

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 09:28:56 |
  2. URL |
  3. Payton_Wisconsin #XsKzHJts
  4. [ 編集 ]

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 09:51:50 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kylie_Kentucky #yxEKPZdY
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 10:39:10 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexis_Pennsylvania #/9ugV/Mk
  4. [ 編集 ]

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 11:13:24 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alyssa_Montana #GoqpMKGM
  4. [ 編集 ]

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 11:52:41 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sarah_Connecticut #YYwwlStU
  4. [ 編集 ]

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 12:40:15 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ava_Mississippi #wzlVrUuo
  4. [ 編集 ]

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 13:08:27 |
  2. URL |
  3. Anna_Kansas #ItPw8l7U
  4. [ 編集 ]

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 14:06:34 |
  2. URL |
  3. Riley_Mississippi #K487qlRo
  4. [ 編集 ]

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 14:22:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. Grace_South_Carolina #yRZaJWoA
  4. [ 編集 ]

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 15:29:12 |
  2. URL |
  3. Amelia_New_Jersey #eCdYp2YM
  4. [ 編集 ]

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 15:34:45 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexa_Rhode_Island #Cd7I8bDk
  4. [ 編集 ]

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 16:51:19 |
  2. URL |
  3. Trinity_Ohio #I5kaDUGM
  4. [ 編集 ]

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 16:58:07 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maria_Minnesota #L6RqcJlI
  4. [ 編集 ]

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 18:26:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Paige_Wisconsin #cgfXev7k
  4. [ 編集 ]

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 19:47:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Serenity_Florida #SFr3kraE
  4. [ 編集 ]

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 20:31:58 |
  2. URL |
  3. Angelina_Georgia #hEdu6aB2
  4. [ 編集 ]

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 21:15:24 |
  2. URL |
  3. Layla_Wisconsin #mp3KFkXc
  4. [ 編集 ]

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 21:42:31 |
  2. URL |
  3. Andrea_Hawaii #ggcBFQ9.
  4. [ 編集 ]

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 22:44:37 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jasmine_Tennessee #GOQoPmvs
  4. [ 編集 ]

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/06/26(Tue) 22:58:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madison_Montana #bFW3vdHo
  4. [ 編集 ]

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 00:14:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emma_Connecticut #8TfcS7yo
  4. [ 編集 ]

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 00:16:23 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jessica_Washington #./O5rUNU
  4. [ 編集 ]

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 01:44:56 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sophie_Minnesota #FvjIlM/E
  4. [ 編集 ]

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 02:38:01 |
  2. URL |
  3. Serenity_Oregon #pN3IeEZM
  4. [ 編集 ]

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 03:13:09 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maria_Pennsylvania #tZ0/kB9M
  4. [ 編集 ]

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 03:52:47 |
  2. URL |
  3. Zoe_New_Mexico #U.wd7Dmk
  4. [ 編集 ]

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 04:41:50 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexa_Kentucky #Y1XKud0Y
  4. [ 編集 ]

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 05:07:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Victoria_Mississippi #KRwfkWAQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 06:00:05 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sarah_Georgia #WKP1Ei2w
  4. [ 編集 ]

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 06:16:02 |
  2. URL |
  3. Melanie_Massachusetts #PlpPRgA.
  4. [ 編集 ]

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 07:27:21 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sofia_Wisconsin #IgEwvFi2
  4. [ 編集 ]

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 07:31:51 |
  2. URL |
  3. Addison_Idaho #G20gvLWY
  4. [ 編集 ]

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 08:45:20 |
  2. URL |
  3. Natalia_Utah #DdYGEOcQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 08:52:21 |
  2. URL |
  3. Molly_Pennsylvania #mnzl1FlY
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 09:51:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Hannah_New_York #Q75GKTiI
  4. [ 編集 ]

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 10:10:24 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madison_Wisconsin #ebPUQLP2
  4. [ 編集 ]

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 11:05:51 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaitlyn_North_Dakota #IfzB5i5A
  4. [ 編集 ]

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 11:38:27 |
  2. URL |
  3. Gianna_Vermont #3YEqjOOk
  4. [ 編集 ]

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 13:05:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Zoey_Iowa #f1Lg5zZw
  4. [ 編集 ]

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 14:31:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Valeria_Washington #.VsCfOfQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 16:43:19 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madison_Idaho #wHeYpQCU
  4. [ 編集 ]

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 17:22:54 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alyssa_Michigan #St7dYkms
  4. [ 編集 ]

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 18:07:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Stella_Georgia #lrbUyvVI
  4. [ 編集 ]

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 18:49:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Morgan_Washington #d4yi0r1c
  4. [ 編集 ]

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 20:13:32 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ariana_Rhode_Island #TWRQElck
  4. [ 編集 ]

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 21:16:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Payton_Colorado #sq.2/bMg
  4. [ 編集 ]

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 22:12:16 |
  2. URL |
  3. Grace_North_Carolina #pSzZUx0o
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/27(Wed) 23:01:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Layla_Georgia #6ntnxtqc
  4. [ 編集 ]

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 00:13:22 |
  2. URL |
  3. Stella_Utah #jIomOhqw
  4. [ 編集 ]

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 00:50:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kylie_Massachusetts #IBuI1DoU
  4. [ 編集 ]

I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 02:12:13 |
  2. URL |
  3. Angelina_Virginia #MnIueP62
  4. [ 編集 ]

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 02:32:34 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sarah_Connecticut #zPLj67nE
  4. [ 編集 ]

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 04:03:37 |
  2. URL |
  3. Hannah_Indiana #FExBzdhQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 04:08:57 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ella_Nevada #4uGJe9F6
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 05:48:05 |
  2. URL |
  3. Payton_Oregon #WMMg2.mQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 06:03:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alyssa_Connecticut #v5k0bMFk
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 07:21:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alyssa_New_Hampshire #2lyjPViw
  4. [ 編集 ]

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 08:01:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Valeria_Louisiana #zCoYZUdA
  4. [ 編集 ]

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 09:00:24 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jasmine_Massachusetts #KymFJO8w
  4. [ 編集 ]

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 09:57:09 |
  2. URL |
  3. Abigail_Iowa #8aM4Zi3I
  4. [ 編集 ]

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 11:59:42 |
  2. URL |
  3. Payton_Oregon #YpLc9LPc
  4. [ 編集 ]

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 14:02:38 |
  2. URL |
  3. Camila_New_Jersey #PMLMPn7w
  4. [ 編集 ]

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 15:57:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. Camila_Pennsylvania #iKxoN8BI
  4. [ 編集 ]

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 18:06:28 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madison_Hawaii #rxcunO42
  4. [ 編集 ]

In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 20:09:27 |
  2. URL |
  3. Katherine_Virginia #SnHIzAY6
  4. [ 編集 ]

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/06/28(Thu) 22:11:12 |
  2. URL |
  3. Camila_Illinois #c.jKtF/k
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 00:15:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. Samantha_Alaska #1VydQVTk
  4. [ 編集 ]

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 02:23:40 |
  2. URL |
  3. Brooklyn_Missouri #RI79z1OQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 04:20:07 |
  2. URL |
  3. Leah_Mississippi #PgYc47kY
  4. [ 編集 ]

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 06:25:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Katherine_Iowa #szS0m2xQ
  4. [ 編集 ]

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 08:20:28 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maria_Oregon #sJrivZzY
  4. [ 編集 ]

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 12:11:37 |
  2. URL |
  3. Grace_Michigan #GsbcPk/M
  4. [ 編集 ]

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 14:05:41 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maya_Michigan #9M6pXaHk
  4. [ 編集 ]

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 15:59:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Andrea_Colorado #sOUmElVM
  4. [ 編集 ]

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 17:12:12 |
  2. URL |
  3. Autumn_Alabama #VZN7heB.
  4. [ 編集 ]

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 17:17:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mia_Alabama #3SWtFh3U
  4. [ 編集 ]

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 19:14:51 |
  2. URL |
  3. Grace_Maryland #izbjnXf.
  4. [ 編集 ]

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 19:26:11 |
  2. URL |
  3. Olivia_California #TuvFtWwg
  4. [ 編集 ]

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 21:21:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Gianna_Massachusetts #lgyqJLZ2
  4. [ 編集 ]

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 21:35:51 |
  2. URL |
  3. Olivia_Nebraska #9BkRVUEg
  4. [ 編集 ]

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
  1. 2012/06/29(Fri) 23:51:02 |
  2. URL |
  3. Gabrielle_North_Carolina #V.160M22
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/30(Sat) 01:52:01 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mariah_Massachusetts #EkO57.c.
  4. [ 編集 ]

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/30(Sat) 01:59:55 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emily_Kentucky #DYS2lRq2
  4. [ 編集 ]

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
  1. 2012/06/30(Sat) 04:09:31 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madeline_Illinois #uR97GFh2
  4. [ 編集 ]

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/06/30(Sat) 06:22:21 |
  2. URL |
  3. Serenity_Delaware #ymn9IQB2
  4. [ 編集 ]

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/06/30(Sat) 06:22:28 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ariana_Alaska #9qbk38/o
  4. [ 編集 ]

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/06/30(Sat) 10:49:24 |
  2. URL |
  3. Victoria_Wyoming #gLh/Z0kU
  4. [ 編集 ]

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/06/30(Sat) 12:51:00 |
  2. URL |
  3. Samantha_Nebraska #4Dxidtic
  4. [ 編集 ]

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
  1. 2012/06/30(Sat) 15:19:09 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaitlyn_New_Mexico #GfJAPDb2
  4. [ 編集 ]

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  1. 2012/06/30(Sat) 17:04:08 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaylee_Delaware #UZFgbtT2
  4. [ 編集 ]

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
  1. 2012/06/30(Sat) 19:14:29 |
  2. URL |
  3. Caroline_New_Hampshire #hLgnwUvo
  4. [ 編集 ]

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/30(Sat) 21:17:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Julia_New_Hampshire #KmLvkkXs
  4. [ 編集 ]

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
  1. 2012/07/01(Sun) 00:03:35 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jasmine_Iowa #gO2T/6h.
  4. [ 編集 ]

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/07/01(Sun) 04:32:19 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madelyn_Louisiana #bqFNceX6
  4. [ 編集 ]

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/07/01(Sun) 05:45:31 |
  2. URL |
  3. Autumn_Mississippi #fatS3SoE
  4. [ 編集 ]

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/07/01(Sun) 10:59:58 |
  2. URL |
  3. Naomi_Georgia #bKdYmHUk
  4. [ 編集 ]

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/07/01(Sun) 14:24:03 |
  2. URL |
  3. Natalia_Ohio #ZDv4xers
  4. [ 編集 ]

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/07/01(Sun) 16:20:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ella_Rhode_Island #BNQLxIAk
  4. [ 編集 ]

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/07/01(Sun) 17:51:35 |
  2. URL |
  3. Natalie_Utah #SiXxX3Lk
  4. [ 編集 ]

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
  1. 2012/07/10(Tue) 20:21:33 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sarah_Oregon #QxDh5TYg
  4. [ 編集 ]

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/07/11(Wed) 15:15:13 |
  2. URL |
  3. Serenity_Kentucky #OHEsWHYk
  4. [ 編集 ]

comment


管理者にだけ表示を許可する

トラックバック

トラックバック URL
http://kikuko3.blog97.fc2.com/tb.php/182-80f310de
この記事にトラックバックする(FC2ブログユーザー)
上記広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書くことで広告を消せます。